Thursday, February 26, 2009

Dilution?? Nationalization?? We shall see.....

Citigroup Close to Reaching Deal With Government
By: Reuters | 25 Feb 2009 | 10:05 PM ET
Text Size

Citigroup is closing in on an agreement to boost the U.S. government's stake in it to as much as 40 percent, the Wall Street Journal reported on its website, citing people familiar with the situation.

A deal could be announced as soon as Thursday, it said.

But a greater U.S. stake will bring a slew of new complications for executives of the New York company, the report said.

Mexican law bars any institution more than 10 percent-owned by a foreign government from running a bank in that country. Some Citigroup executives are worried that an increased U.S. stake might subject the bank to pressure to relinquish some or all of its ownership of Grupo Financiero Banamex, the No. 2 bank in Mexico by assets, the Journal said.

Though Citigroup is loath to shed Banamex, seen as a crown jewel of the bank's operations, executives have concluded that the issue will probably have to be resolved through diplomatic channels between the United States and Mexico, people familiar with the matter said, according to the report.

A representative of Citigroup was not immediately available for comment.

Word that the U.S. might be raising its stake in Citi first broke last week and intensified speculation that U.S. banks might increasingly face nationalization.

If one were to compare Citigroup's market capitalization with the number of preferred shares the government currently owns, these shares if converted right now to common stock, would be worth more than 100 percent of Citi's total market capitalization. 

Any additional money that Citi receives from the government automatically means a further stock dilution. While Obama Administration officials say this isn't nationalization, markets may interpret the situation differently and see it as de facto nationalization.

Citigroup stock dropped below $2 last week for the first time since January 1991, buffeted by nationalization speculation and closed at $2.52 on Wednesday. Citi stock [C  2.65    0.13 (+5.16%)   ] has dropped 71 percent so far in 2009.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Stress test details......what happens if they fail the test?

WASHINGTON -- U.S. officials unveiled details Wednesday of how they plan to convert preferred shares the U.S. Treasury holds in hundreds of financial institutions into common stock that would help banks survive an even worse-than-projected economic downturn.

Under the plan, which includes "stress tests" aimed at measuring how the banks would hold up under both baseline and extreme economic situations, institutions would have six months to raise private capital before getting a government-issued capital buffer.

"Supervisors will work with institutions to estimate the range of possible future losses and the resources to absorb such losses over a two-year period," banking regulators said in a joint statement. The adverse situation tests would assume a 2010 unemployment rate of 10.3%, Case-Shiller home price declines of 22% in 2009 and 7% in 2010 and gross domestic product contractions of 3.3% in 2009 and 0.5 in 2010.

Regulators expect to complete the tests by the end of April.

Any capital provided to the institutions under the new program, known as the Capital Assistance Program, would be preferred securities convertible into common equity at a 10% discount to the prevailing price as of Feb. 9. The securities will come with a 9% dividend and would be convertible at the issuers' request once supervisory approval has been received, the U.S. Treasury said Wednesday.

If not converted or redeemed within seven years, the securities would automatically be converted into common stock.

Banks that have already issued preferred shares to the U.S. government under the Troubled Asset Relief Program's Capital Purchase Program would be able to convert those shares to the new convertible instruments. The government has so far invested more than $196 billion in more than 400 institutions through that program.

The new government investments require banks to submit plans for their use of government capital. Any bank participating in the program also will be subject to restrictions on dividend payments, share repurchases and acquisitions.

Banking regulators in their joint release said, "Currently, the major U.S. banking institutions have capital in excess of the amounts required to be considered well capitalized."

The U.S. is requiring banks with assets of more than $100 billion to participate in the stress tests. Those banks will be given immediate access to government capital if needed.

Write to Meena Thiruvengadam at meena.thiruvengadam@dowjones.com and Michael R. Crittenden at michael.crittenden@dowjones.com

Monday, February 23, 2009

"If I was leaving it wouldn't stop me"......sign of the times?

Morgan Stanley, Smith Barney Brokers To Get Stay Bonuses
Dow Jones

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Morgan Stanley (MS) plans to offer its top-producing financial advisers and those at Citigroup Inc.'s (C)Smith Barney as much as 105% of their annual production to stay with the two firms as they create a joint venture.

The retention deal was announced to branch managers at both firms a few hours after Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) said it won't be handing out retention bonuses to the Wachovia Securities brokerage force.

Morgan Stanley spokesman confirmed the details of the package but declined to comment further.

The package is in the form of a nine-year forgivable loan, and brokers won't receive the money until January 2010. The delay isn't typical for retention packages, but the firms want to ensure that the money is coming from future earnings from the planned Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture and not from taxpayer money the firms received from the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

The firms expect the deal on the joint venture, which will have roughly 20,000 brokers, to close in June.

The package is on a sliding scale and ranges from offering brokers with $500, 000-$749,999 in production 30% of their production in cash. Brokers with $750, 000-$999,999 are eligible to receive 50% of production. Those with $1 million and more will receive 75% of their production in cash in January 2010.

The deal also offered deferred compensation that will be paid out in January 2012. The $1.75 million and up producers will receive another 30% of production. All other brokers will receive bonuses from 25%-30% of production if they are able to grow their production by 25% in the next three years.

"I think its probably a tad better than the Merrill Lynch deal and is certainly a hell of a lot better than Wachovia deal," said a Smith Barney broker in the U.S. Midwest.

"It's an okay deal, but if I was leaving it wouldn't stop me," he added.

Brokers at both Morgan Stanley and Smith Barney were nervous earlier Friday that they would share the same fate as colleagues at Wachovia Securities.

"Everyone was freaking out here. We are going to have a much better weekend now," said a Smith Barneybroker in the Southeast.

-By Brett Philbin, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5393; brett.philbin@ dowjones.com

-By Annie Gasparro, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5174; annie.gasparro@ dowjones.com

  (END) Dow Jones Newswires   02-20-09 1715ET   Copyright (c) 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Nationalization?....where has all your equity gone??

BofA's Lewis Subpoenaed, Sees No Nationalization
By: Reuters | 19 Feb 2009 | 11:23 PM ET
Text Size

Bank of America Chairman and Chief Executive Kenneth Lewis was subpoenaed last week by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, who is investigating whether the bank violated state law by withholding information from investors, a source familiar with the case confirms to CNBC.

The Wall Street Journal reports that investigators took testimony all day Thursday from former Merrill Chief Executive John Thain, citing the people. Thain was asked about $4 billion in bonuses paid to Merrill employees, and in particular why Bank of America's merger agreement with Merrill contained a nonpublic attachment outlining the maximum Merrill could pay, the newspaper said.

Separately, Lewis told Bank of America executives at a senior leadership meeting on Thursday that Washington policy officials have assured him that the possibility of nationalizing the largest U.S. bank by assets is not on the table, the newspaper said, citing a person at the meeting.

Cuomo's office, Bank of America and a spokesman for Thain did not return calls seeking comment. Spokesmen for Bank of America and Thain declined to comment to the newspaper.

Lewis would be the highest-profile subject of Cuomo's examination of Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America's purchase of New York-based Merrill on Jan. 1.

Barely two weeks after the closing, Bank of America revealed that Merrill lost $15.31 billion in the fourth quarter, and got an emergency federal bailout including $20 billion of new capital and a loss-sharing agreement on $118 billion of troubled assets.

Bank of America shares [BAC  3.23    -0.70  (-17.81%)   ] closed down 14 percent at $3.93 Thursday on fears that losses from Merrill, credit cards, recently acquired mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp and other areas could lead to government control, wiping out shareholders. Lewis has run Bank of America since 2001.

Cuomo's investigators are probing, among other things, whether trading losses were adequately disclosed to shareholders and boards of both companies, and what top executives approving the bonuses knew about the losses, the newspaper said.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

What seems to be moving the markets????

Team Obama demonstrated remarkable discipline during the presidential campaign. From raising an unprecedented amount of money to milking every advantage from the Internet to grabbing lots of delegates from inexpensive caucus states, they left nothing to chance.

And now the administration has scored a major legislative victory in an extraordinarily short period of time. Less than 700 hours after taking the oath of office, President Barack Obama signed the largest spending bill in American history.

Nevertheless, this fast start can't overcome a growing sense the administration is winging it on issues large and small.

Take the vetting of cabinet nominees. Mr. Obama's aides ignored a federal investigation of New Mexico's Gov. Bill Richardson that started last August for a possible pay-for-play scandal. Mr. Richardson had to withdraw after being named to become secretary of commerce.

The administration treated as inconsequential the failure of its choices for Treasury secretary and White House performance officer, as well as its labor secretary-designate's spouse, to pay taxes. It failed to uncover Tom Daschle's problems with more than $102,943 in previously unpaid taxes, penalties and interest -- and once it did, aides assumed Mr. Daschle would be given a pass.

Team Obama promised Gen. Anthony Zinni he'd be ambassador to Iraq, then cut him loose without explanation. After the Bill Richardson fiasco, it romanced Republican Sen. Judd Gregg for commerce secretary -- then ignored his advice on the stimulus and wouldn't trust him with running the department, moving supervision of the Census into the White House. Mr. Gregg withdrew himself from consideration.

Then there is the stimulus itself. Mr. Obama's economic team met with congressional leaders in December to green light a bill costing up to $850 billion. But they described less than $200 billion of what they wanted in the envelope. In return for outsourcing the bill's drafting to Congress, the administration took on two responsibilities: running polls to advise Hill Democrats on how to sharpen their marketing, and putting the president on the road to sell a bill others wrote.

About Karl Rove

Karl Rove served as Senior Advisor to President George W. Bush from 2000–2007 and Deputy Chief of Staff from 2004–2007. At the White House he oversaw the Offices of Strategic Initiatives, Political Affairs, Public Liaison, and Intergovernmental Affairs and was Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, coordinating the White House policy making process.

Before Karl became known as "The Architect" of President Bush's 2000 and 2004 campaigns, he was president of Karl Rove + Company, an Austin-based public affairs firm that worked for Republican candidates, nonpartisan causes, and nonprofit groups. His clients included over 75 Republican U.S. Senate, Congressional and gubernatorial candidates in 24 states, as well as the Moderate Party of Sweden.

Karl writes a weekly op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, is a Newsweek columnist and is now writing a book to be published by Simon & Schuster. Email the author at Karl@Rove.com or visit him on the web at Rove.com.

Team Obama was winging it when it declared the stimulus would "save or create" 2.5 million, then three million, then 3.7 million, and then four million new jobs. These were arbitrary and erratic numbers, and they knew there's no way to count "saved" jobs. Americans, being commonsensical, will focus on Mr. Obama's promise to "create" jobs. It's highly unlikely that more than 180,000 jobs will be created each month by the end of next year. The precise, state-by-state job numbers the administration used to sell the stimulus are likely to come back to haunt them as well.

Bipartisanship? The administration failed even to respond to GOP offers to endorse an Obama campaign proposal to suspend capital gains taxes for new small businesses.

Inexplicably, the president, in a prime-time press conference, raised expectations for Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's bank rescue plan, which turned out the next day to be no plan at all. The markets craved details; they got none. When markets cratered, spokesmen didn't acknowledge the administration's poor planning, but blamed the markets.

Team Obama was also winging it on enhanced interrogation of terrorists. First it nullified all the Bush administration's legal authorities before considering what rules it should have in place. When the CIA briefed White House officials on the results obtained from these techniques, the administration backtracked and organized a four-month study of what rules were appropriate.

Something similar happened with the promise to close Guantanamo Bay within a year: The administration has no idea what it will do with the violent terrorists detained there. And on ethics, Mr. Obama proclaimed an end to lobbyist influence in government -- even as he was nominating lobbyists for major posts and filling White House ranks with former lobbyists.

Team Obama has been living off its campaign reputation for planning and execution. That reputation is now frayed, and all the bumbling and unforced errors will have an impact. Such things don't go unnoticed on Capitol Hill or in foreign capitals.

The president, a bright and skilled politician, has plenty of time to recover. The danger is that what we have seen is not an aberration, but the early indications of his governing style. Barack Obama won the job he craved, now he must demonstrate that he and his team are up to its requirements. The signs are worrisome. The world is a dangerous place. The days of winging it need to end.

Mr. Rove is the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Stanford.....another case of "greed gone wild"!!!

U.S. Accuses Texas Financial Firm of ‘Massive’ Fraud
FRAUD SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STANFORD PONZI SCHEME MADOFF
The New York Times
| 17 Feb 2009 | 12:14 PM ET

Stopping what it called a “massive ongoing fraud,” the Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday accused Robert Allen Stanford, the chief of the Stanford Financial Group, of fraud in the sale of about $8 billion of high-yielding certificates of deposit held in the firm’s bank in Antigua. Also named in the suit were two other executives and some affiliates of the financial group.

In the complaint, filed in Federal District Court in Dallas, the S.E.C. accused Mr. Stanford and two associates — James M. Davis, a director and chief financial officer of Stanford Group and the Antigua-based bank affiliate, and Laura Pendergest-Holt, the chief investment officer of both organizations — with misrepresenting the safety and liquidity of the uninsured CDs.

The CDs were sold by Stanford International Bank through the firm’s registered broker-dealer and investment adviser, which are in Houston. Both the bank, which claims $8.5 billion in assets and 30,000 clients in 131 countries, and the brokerage unit, which operates about 30 offices in the United States, were named in the S.E.C. suit. Stanford Financial asserts that it advises about $50 billion in assets.

  • Federal Agents Seen Entering Stanford Offices — Story Here
  • In its complaint, the S.E.C. said it could not account for the $8 billion in assets that were housed in the Antigua bank after issuing subpoenas for bank records and to various witnesses. Most witnesses, including Mr. Stanford, Mr. Davis, and the Antigua-based bank’s president, failed to appear to testify nor did they produce documents shedding light on the assets.

    Ms. Pendergest-Holt said in testimony to the S.E.C. that she could not account for the assets, asserting that Mr. Stanford and Mr. Davis were the only ones with access to the bank’s assets.

    In the complaint, the S.E.C. called “improbable, if not impossible” claims by the offshore bank that it paid “significantly” higher returns on its CDs because of the high quality of its investments.

    The S.E.C. accused the bank and its affiliates of falsely stating in marketing materials that client funds were placed in liquid financial instruments, when in fact they were invested in private equity funds and real estate. On Nov. 28, Stanford International Bank quoted a rate of 5.375 percent on a $100,000 three-year CD, compared with rates of less than 3.2 percent at American banks. The bank recently has offered rates of more than 10 percent on five-year CDs, the filing stated.

  • Read the Complaint
  • Read the Legal Memorandum
  • In the complaint, the S.E.C. requested that the defendants’ assets be frozen and that a receiver be appointed to take control of business operations. It also requested that the assets of the bank and other offshore units be repatriated. And the agency asked that Mr. Stanford and the other named executives be required to surrender their passports.

    The S.E.C. has come under fire in Congress and the media for ignoring repeated warnings over a period of years about the Bernard L. Madoff, who is accused of running a $50 billion Ponzi scheme. While investigators have been looking at Mr. Stanford and his financial empire’s activities for many months, the scrutiny into the too-good-to-be-true returns on the CDs increased substantially after the Madoff case.

    Oddly enough, even the Stanford operation was touched by Mr. Madoff. Despite the fact the Antigua-bank assured investors in a report in December 2008 that it had no “direct or indirect” exposure Mr. Madoff’s funds, the bank suffered an estimated $400,000 in losses, apparently through investments in so-called “feeder funds.”

    Additionally, the S.E.C. accused Stanford Capital Management, another Houston-based investment advisory unit, of inflating the performance of its $1.2 billion-asset Stanford Allocation Strategy mutual fund in promoting it to prospective investors.

  • Slideshow: Wall Street Rogues Gallery
  • The complaint also accused the offshore banking unit and the Houston-based broker dealer of violating provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940 in failing to register as an investment company.

    Friday, February 13, 2009

    Interesting Commentary....to say the least!

    B of A, Citigroup "In A Year, Gone!"
    Posted By: Jane Wells | Correspondent
    cnbc.com
    | 13 Feb 2009 | 08:45 AM ET

    Those were the words this week from Don Straszheim of Straszheim Global Advisors. He was speaking at the annual forecast dinner for the CFA Society of San Diego. "Gone?" I asked him in disbelief. "You mean, like no more Bank of America Versateller ATM for me?" Well, no, he told me. "Just gone as in no shareholder equity left. I don't see how B of A or Citi can be worth anything."

    Straszheim gave an impassioned speech to the crowd of finance professionals. He was joined by Liz Ann Sonders, Schwab's Chief Investment Strategist. I moderated the event, taking notes furiously.

    Forecasting is always a perilous endeavor, but here are the highlights of what these two pros see looking ahead, based, in part, on looking back.

    Straszheim, a well-known expert on China, says we are in the middle of a "global buyers' strike."

    What's more, he says the stimulus plan "makes no sense...it's crazy". Why? It's too big, for one thing. Any stimulus check or tax cut he gets would go into savings, not into spending, "because that's the right thing to do." Instead, Straszheim would prefer a package of $250 billion, with most of that going to "those bleeding the most," that is, the unemployed, etc.

    Straszheim really gets worked up over the government's desire to get consumers borrowing to spend again, believing one of the worst things that could happen is cheap credit. "I remember when a credit card was for convenience, not a reason to buy things we can't afford." He'd be happy to see credit card interest rates double. He also predicts more gloom for the retail sector, saying years of easy credit have led to "30 percent too much capacity in the retail system", and a lot of stores won't survive.

    Other thoughts from Straszheim:

    "I think there's gonna be real brain drain from all those companies that have TARP money to those that don't."

    "China is going to be weaker I think than most anyone believes." He predicts only two percent growth in China this year, but believes Chinese companies are still a better play than multinationals, suggesting investors look into the FXI, an ETF filled with 25 state-owned companies.

    Finally, Straszheim predicts the financial sector, which has already fallen to only 10 percent of total value of the S&P 500, will fall to three percent by the end of 2009. Still, for the market overall, he says, "Fortunes are made at bottoms not at tops."

    SONDERS--"MORE CONSTRUCTIVE NOW"

    Liz Ann Sonders, who turned bearish is mid 2006, says that now, "I'm not boldly optimistic but more constructive" about the market. She agrees with Straszheim that the "politicians are wrong" for thinking the solution to fixing our economy is to stimulate lending to consumers--that's what got us in trouble in the first place.

    She believes Treasuries are in a bubble, but isn't sure when that'll pop. However, she says the yield curve is signaling a recovery.

    And using history as a guide, Sonders pointed to some hopeful signs. For one thing, she says recessions in the post WWII era usually last 13 months, and we are 14 months into this one.

    Sonders points to a couple of indicators, one worth noting, the other she says you should ignore. The one worth noting is GDP. Historically, once the GDP hits its lowest point in a recession, a year later the S&P 500 jumps 25 percent. The indicator you should ignore is unemployment. In her opinion it is a massively lagging indicator, peaking, on average, six months AFTER a recession ends and probably a year after the stock market bottoms.

    Finally, Sonders says people are starting to invest again. In December, 42 percent of US investments were in cash, 42 percent in stocks, and 16 percent in bonds and bond funds. One month later in January, the breakdown had changed to only 30 percent cash, 48 percent stocks, and 22 percent bonds and bond funds. "The deer in the headlights era has passed."

    Let's hope so.

    Tuesday, February 10, 2009

    Headlines of the day......and the future of America's markets.

    WASHINGTON -- Efforts to date to boost the financial sector have been "inadequate," and now the government needs to focus on ways to help make banks' balance sheets stronger, U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is prepared to say in a speech later Tuesday.

    "We're going to require banking institutions to go through a carefully designed comprehensive stress test, to use the medical term," Mr. Geithner will say, according to excerpts of his speech. "We want their balance sheets cleaner, and stronger. And we are going to help this process by providing a new program of capital support for those institutions which need it."

    [Timothy Geithner]

    TIMOTHY GEITHNER

    The stress tests will be part of the bailout revamp to be announced Tuesday by Treasury Secretary Geithner. In addition to fresh capital injections into banks, the new approach will include programs to help struggling homeowners; a significant expansion of a Federal Reserve program designed to jump-start consumer lending; and a private-public partnership to relieve banks of bad assets.

    Mr. Geithner added that the financial system currently seems to be "working against recovery, and that's the dangerous dynamic we need to change." He added that any capital the government infuses into banks will come with conditions.

    The administration wants to ensure "that every dollar of assistance preserves or generates lending capital above the level that would have been possible in the absence of government support," he said.

    Mr. Geithner noted that the Treasury Department, along with the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., is working to launch a public-private investment fund to help value financial firms' assets.

    "This program will provide government capital and government financing to help leverage private capital to help get private markets working again for the legacy loans and assets that are now burdening the entire financial system," Mr. Geithner said in the excerpts of the prepared remarks. "By providing the financing the private markets cannot now provide, this will help start a process of providing a market for the real estate related assets that are at the center of the this crisis."

    The administration's objective "is to use private capital and private asset managers to help provide a market mechanism for valuing the assets," he continued.

    The new Treasury chief said no financial recovery plan could be successful without restarting securitization markets for sound loans made to consumers and businesses.

    "This is a challenge more complex than any our financial system has ever faced, requiring new systems and persistent attention to solve," he said. "But the President, the Treasury and the entire administration are committed to see it through because we know how directly the future of our economy depends on it."

    Mr. Geithner is expected to present the moves as a multi-pronged effort to encourage financial institutions to lend again. The administration's goal is to unfreeze dysfunctional credit markets that have dragged the economy into a recession. He will also announce new conditions on banks receiving aid, including documenting how the money is helping to generate new loans.

    The expanded effort could see as much as $2 trillion in financing flowing through the system, according to Congressional officials briefed Monday night. The expanded Fed facility and the "bad bank" could each reach $1 trillion in size, both of which would be seeded with bailout funds.

    The administration is discussing spending between $100 billion and $200 billion investing new funds in banks, up to $100 billion to expand the Federal Reserve facility and $50 billion to help homeowners. The Treasury wants to keep some money available in case of emergencies. These commitments could eat up much of the second half of the $700 billion bailout fund.

    The Obama administration's initial attempt to sell the plan got off to a rocky start on Capitol Hill Monday evening in briefings with House and Senate staffers. Officials told packed meetings Mr. Geithner would lay out a framework Tuesday for the financial rescue. But a lack of detail was met with skepticism as staffers pressed for more information.

    Rep. Brad Sherman (D., Calif.) asked officials how much taxpayers could be on the hook if the situation in the financial system was to further erode. "I appreciate your filibuster, but that's the other side of the Capitol," Mr. Sherman told the Obama officials, according to a person at the briefing.

    In a press conference Monday night, President Obama said: "We don't know whether we need additional money or how much we need, until we see how successful we are in restoring confidence."

    In an attempt to cast the program in a new light, the administration is renaming the Troubled Asset Relief Program the Financial Stability Plan. The program will remain a part of Treasury but may eventually be separated.

    One of the biggest criticisms of the bailout is that banks receiving aid have sat on the funds instead of loaning them to businesses and consumers. The new bank examinations are designed to ensure that banks that are in need of money but still healthy enough to lend, receive cash. The examinations will be mandatory for banks with assets exceeding $100 billion

    [First 100 days - obama's economic policy]

    News, photos and background on key players and issues in the Obama administration's first 100 days from the WSJ and across the Web.

    Reuters

    President Obama during a news conference at the White House Monday night. As the Senate is poised to pass the stimulus plan, Treasury prepares to announce a revamped banking-industry rescue and enlist the Fed to jump-start lending.

    The move could address disagreements between bank regulators about the viability of scores of institutions. Regulators have struggled to come up with a common set of criteria for deciding which banks should receive money. Setting up a stress test could create a more objective set of standards, which might reveal the depths of the industry's problems.

    Banks have complained that the process for applying for bailout funds is arbitrary. At least two that applied, National Bank of Commerce in Illinois and County Bank in California, were denied by the government and failed. Research firm RBC Capital Markets estimated Monday that more than 1,000 banks could fail in the next three to five years, more than triple its previous estimates.

    Mr. Geithner will also unveil a host of new conditions for banks that receive government aid, including requiring that firms show how the money is being spent and how funds are helping to generate new lending. Banks must show how many new loans they provided with the assistance and how many assets they purchased. They must also agree to implement foreclosure mitigation programs, curb executive pay and not use the funds to purchase healthy banks until the government money is repaid.

    The administration is still finalizing details of its a housing plan -- which centers on financial incentives for mortgage companies to modify bad loans -- and may not get into specifics Tuesday. It is expected to express support for a legislative proposal that would allow judges to alter the terms of troubled mortgages in bankruptcy court, but only if borrowers tried to have their loans modified.

    Another leg of the revamp, a "bad bank" that would buy up toxic assets fouling the financial system, received a cautious welcome on Wall Street. The administration, hoping to avoid spending large sums of taxpayer money, wants the private sector to largely fund the effort. To entice investor participation, the government would limit the risk associated with buying the assets.